z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does Increased State Pharmacy Regulatory Burden Lead to Better Public Safety Outcomes?
Author(s) -
Alex J. Adams,
Jennifer L. Adams
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
innovations in pharmacy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2155-0417
DOI - 10.24926/iip.v12i1.3598
Subject(s) - pharmacy , pharmacy practice , state (computer science) , public relations , business , medicine , medical education , family medicine , political science , computer science , algorithm
Pharmacy has traditionally been a highly regulated profession. In a recent study, the state with the largest pharmacy regulatory word count had 6.7 times as many words as the state with the lowest word count. Given the wide variation in state pharmacy regulations, this paper seeks to spark discussion on how we can assess public safety outcomes in states based on the overall volume of pharmacy regulation with a focus on: 1) fitness to practice; 2) controlled substance outcomes; and 3) compounding safety. In examining these categories, existing data sources are limited and suboptimal, though formal disciplinary actions against pharmacy licensees are very infrequent. Thus, it seems preferable for states to have a regulatory framework that allows boards of pharmacy to deal with the rare public safety issues that occur, while not holding back the vast majority of pharmacists from practicing to the top of their education and training.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here