
Organized structure of real-world evidence best practices: moving from fragmented recommendations to comprehensive guidance
Author(s) -
A. Jaksa,
James J. Wu,
Páll Jónsson,
HansGeorg Eichler,
Sarah E Vititoe,
Nicolle M. Gatto
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of comparative effectiveness research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.567
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 2042-6313
pISSN - 2042-6305
DOI - 10.2217/cer-2020-0228
Subject(s) - quality (philosophy) , medicine , process (computing) , process management , management science , risk analysis (engineering) , business , computer science , engineering , philosophy , epistemology , operating system
Decision-makers have become increasingly interested in incorporating real-world evidence (RWE) into their decision-making process. Due to concerns regarding the reliability and quality of RWE, stakeholders have issued numerous recommendation documents to assist in setting RWE standards. The fragmented nature of these documents poses a challenge to researchers and decision-makers looking for guidance on what is ‘high-quality’ RWE and how it can be used in decision-making. We offer researchers and decision-makers a structure to organize the landscape of RWE recommendations and identify consensus and gaps in the current recommendations. To provide researchers with a much needed pathway for generating RWE, we discuss how decision-makers can move from fragmented recommendations to comprehensive guidance.