Open Access<p>The Economic Value of MR-Imaging for Uveal Melanoma</p>
Author(s) -
Lorna Grech Fonk,
Teresa Ferreira,
Andrew Webb,
Gregorius P M Luyten,
JanWillem M. Beenakker
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical ophthalmology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.025
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1177-5483
pISSN - 1177-5467
DOI - 10.2147/opth.s238405
Subject(s) - medicine , brachytherapy , magnetic resonance imaging , ultrasound , fundus photography , fundus (uterus) , radiology , radiation therapy , radiation treatment planning , nuclear medicine , surgery , fluorescein angiography , visual acuity
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intra-ocular tumour. Treatment is determined by tumour size and location. Generally, smaller tumours are eligible for brachytherapy unless they are located close to posterior pole. Larger tumours are enucleated or undergo proton beam therapy (PBT), which is more expensive than brachytherapy and less available. Accuracy of tumour size determination is critical for accurate planning and delivery of treatment, particularly to ensure tumour coverage, critical structure sparing, and for the choice of treatment modality. This is particularly the case for tumour dimensions that are close to the cut-off point for a specific type of treatment: in the case of the brachytherapy protocol at our institution, 6-8 mm. Ultrasound is conventionally used, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently become an additional available tool. Although more expensive, it enables more accurate measurements and is particularly useful in combination with clinical fundus examination, fundus photography and ultrasound. Our aim in this paper was to determine the economic value of MRI for UM treatment.