Open Access<p>A Clinical Comparative Study of Two Different Endometrial Cell Samplers for Evaluation of Endometrial Lesions by Cytopathological Diagnosis</p>
Author(s) -
Shulan Lv,
Qing Wang,
Yan Li,
Lanbo Zhao,
Yiran Wang,
Feng Xue,
Lu Han,
Kailu Zhang,
Panyue Yin,
Huilian Hou,
Guizhi Shi,
Qiling Li
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cancer management and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.024
H-Index - 40
ISSN - 1179-1322
DOI - 10.2147/cmar.s272755
Subject(s) - brush , endometrial cancer , medicine , hysterectomy , cytology , gynecology , atypical hyperplasia , curettage , endometrial hyperplasia , cytopathology , hyperplasia , radiology , cancer , pathology , electrical engineering , engineering
Cytopathology detecting for endometrial cancer is becoming accepted, and Tao Brush is the most widely used sampler for endometrial cells. This study aims to compare the effectiveness between Li brushes and Tao brushes for the diagnosis of endometrial lesions and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial cytology compared with histology.