Open Access<p>Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey</p>
Author(s) -
Lara A Kahale,
Assem Khamis,
B. Diab,
Yaping Chang,
Luciane Cruz Lopes,
Arnav Agarwal,
Ling Li,
Reem A. Mustafa,
Serge Koujanian,
Reem Waziry,
Jason W. Busse,
Abeer Dakik,
Lotty Hooft,
Gordon Guyatt,
R. J. P. M. Scholten,
Elie A. Akl
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.868
H-Index - 58
ISSN - 1179-1349
DOI - 10.2147/clep.s242080
Subject(s) - missing data , meta analysis , systematic review , medicine , medline , statistics , clinical trial , data mining , computer science , mathematics , political science , law
How systematic review authors address missing data among eligible primary studies remains uncertain.