z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing accuracy of high-risk features for detecting advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Abhiram Duvvuri,
Harikrishna Bandla,
Vivek Chandrasekar Thoguluva,
Chandra S. Dasari,
Madhav Desai,
Venkat Nutalapati,
Vishnu Moole,
Anvesh Narimiti,
Himanshu K. Patel,
Frank G. Gress,
Prateek Sharma,
Divyanshoo R. Kohli
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
annals of gastroenterology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.886
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1792-7463
pISSN - 1108-7471
DOI - 10.20524/aog.2021.0630
Subject(s) - medicine , intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm , meta analysis , confidence interval , pancreatic duct , dysplasia , endoscopic ultrasound , gastroenterology , mucinous cystadenoma , pancreas , cyst , predictive value , radiology
The American Gastroenterological Association recommends endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for evaluating pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) with ≥2 high-risk features (HRF), whereas the American College of Gastroenterology recommends EUS for ≥1 HRF. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of using ≥1 vs. ≥2 HRF for assessing the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) and performing EUS in PCL.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here