z-logo
Premium
FURTHER EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF REINFORCER SURVEYS: A SYSTEMATIC REPLICATION
Author(s) -
Northup John
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of applied behavior analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1938-3703
pISSN - 0021-8855
DOI - 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-335
Subject(s) - reinforcement , replication (statistics) , psychology , preference , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , audiology , statistics , social psychology , medicine , mathematics
The present report evaluates the accuracy of a reinforcer survey by comparing the survey results to the results of subsequent reinforcer assessments for 20 children using a concurrent‐operants arrangement to assess relative reinforcer preference. Total accuracy for the survey was determined to be approximately 57%. The results provide a systematic replication of Northup et al. (1996) with a much larger sample of children. A need for the development of more accurate and comprehensive reinforcer assessment methods for verbal children is discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here