Open Access
Differential Amplification of Murine Bipotent Megakaryocytic/Erythroid Progenitor and Precursor Cells During Recovery from Acute and Chronic Erythroid Stress
Author(s) -
Sanchez Massimo,
Weissman Irving L.,
Pallavicini Maria,
Valeri Mauro,
Guglielmelli Paola,
Vannucchi Alessandro Maria,
Migliaccio Giovanni,
Migliaccio Anna Rita
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
stem cells
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.159
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 1549-4918
pISSN - 1066-5099
DOI - 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0023
Subject(s) - biology , progenitor cell , progenitor , microbiology and biotechnology , immunology , stem cell
Abstract Two murine bipotent erythroid/megakaryocytic cells, the progenitor (MEP) and precursor (PEM) cells, recently have been identified on the basis of the phenotypes of lin neg c‐kit pos Sca‐1 neg CD16/CD32 low CD34 low and TER119 pos 4A5 pos or 2D5 pos , respectively. However, the functional relationship between these two subpopulations and their placement in the hemopoietic hierarchy is incompletely understood. We compared the biological properties of these subpopulations in marrow and spleen of mice with and without acute or chronic erythroid stress. MEP cells, but not PEM cells, express c‐kit, respond to stem cell factor in vitro, and form spleen colonies in vivo. PEM cells comprise up to 50%–70% of the cells in BFU‐E–derived colonies but are not present among the progeny of purified MEP cells cultured under erythroid and megakaryocytic permissive conditions. PEM cells increase 10‐ to 20‐fold under acute and chronic stress, whereas MEP cell increases (21%–84%) are observed only in acutely stressed animals. These data suggest that MEP and PEM cells represent distinct cell populations that may exist in an upstream‐downstream differentiation relationship under conditions of stress. Whereas the dynamics of both populations are altered by stress induction, the differential response to acute and chronic stress suggests different regulatory mechanisms. A model describing the relationship between MEP, PEM, and common myeloid progenitor cells is presented.