English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First we consider a ruin theory approach along with risk measures in order to determine the solvency capital of long-term guarantees such as life insurances or pension products. Secondly, for such products,we challenge the definition of the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) under the Solvency II (SII) regulatory framework based on a yearly viewpoint. Several methods for the calculation of the solvency capital are presented. We start our study with risk measures as considered in the SII framework and then proceed with the ruin theory approach. Instead of considering the continuous time setting of the ruin theory,we consider the discrete time—the yearly basis—of the accounting viewpoint.We finally give an illustration with a fixed guaranteed rate product along with the equity, interest rate and longevity risks. The latter risk brings us to consider zero-coupon longevity bonds in which we invest the capital. We show that long-term guarantees might be overloaded under the SII regulation.

Risk measures versus ruin theory for the calculation of solvency capital for long-term life insurances