English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This study reconceptualizes cancel culture as a platform-mediated contest over scalar moral legitimacy, where digital infrastructures and narrative strategies jointly shape reputational outcomes. Integrating Self-Categorization Theory, Social Comparison Theory, and Kramer’s concept of strategic scaling, the paper introduces the SCT/SCoT-Platformized Scaling Model to explain how identity dynamics, moral comparison, and platform affordances interact to construct and contest public reputations. Analyzing eight high-profile cases, the study demonstrates that algorithmic amplification fuels polarization through emotional contagion; reputational management hinges on strategic scalar framing (upscaling ideological stakes or downscaling individual culpability); and platform governance selectively enforces cancellation based on corporate risk calculus. This integrated analysis advances understanding of cancel culture as a sociotechnical and semiotic struggle for moral legitimacy in digital publics.

Strategic scaling and moral semiosis: a multimodal model of cancel culture in Platformized publics