English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Compartmental models have emerged as useful tools in epidemiology due to their mechanistic nature. They provide insights into complex dynamic systems and allow predictions under different scenarios. However, despite their widespread use, there is still a gap in the literature, concerning their statistical formalization and a systematic discussion of the statistical methods suitable for both tasks of inference and forecasting. In this work, starting from the fundamental distinction between deterministic and stochastic compartmental models, we focus on how the formulation of the likelihood function becomes a necessary and challenging step in the transition from a deterministic to a stochastic framework. We then analyse the various difficulties encountered in evaluating the likelihood function associated with discrete-time stochastic models. We distinguish two reasons for the intractability of the likelihood function, the high dimension of missing data and the complexity of the model structure, and discuss suitable methods for addressing the problem both from a frequentist and Bayesian perspective. We overview likelihood-based methods and explore the use of likelihood-free approaches in this framework, namely approximate Bayesian computation algorithms and a method that combines model calibration with a parametric bootstrap procedure. We emphasize their ability to make inferences from data that are partially observed, or only observed in some aggregated form. To showcase their feasibility and reliability, we compare the likelihood-free and likelihood-based methods at work with a toy example of the Susceptible-Infected-Removed. Finally, we explore the relevance of likelihood-free methods in a real-world framework through an example of a complex compartmental model developed to study smoking dynamics in Tuscany (Italy).

epidemiologic methods

Discrete-time compartmental models with partially observed data: a comparison among frequentist and Bayesian approaches for addressing likelihood intractability