z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Landscape and Clonal Dominance of Co-occurring Genomic Alterations in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping
Author(s) -
Xiuning Le,
Lingzhi Hong,
Charles H. Hensel,
Rongrong Chen,
Haley N. Kemp,
Niamh Coleman,
Christine Ciunci,
Stephen V. Liu,
Marcelo V. Negrão,
Jennifer Yen,
Xuefeng Xia,
Juergen Scheuenpflug,
Christopher Stroh,
Dilafruz Juraeva,
Anne S. Tsao,
David S. Hong,
Victoria M. Raymond,
Paul K. Paik,
Jianjun Zhang,
John V. Heymach
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jco precision oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.405
H-Index - 22
ISSN - 2473-4284
DOI - 10.1200/po.21.00135
Subject(s) - kras , pten , cancer research , biology , crizotinib , exon , ros1 , lung cancer , tyrosine kinase , mutation , population , protein kinase domain , genetics , cabozantinib , cdkn2a , cancer , oncology , medicine , gene , adenocarcinoma , mutant , pi3k/akt/mtor pathway , receptor , environmental health , malignant pleural effusion , apoptosis
PURPOSE MET exon 14 skipping alterations ( METex14) comprise a diverse set of actionable oncogene drivers in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have established the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for this patient population. The landscape of co-occurring genetic alterations in METex14 NSCLC and their potential impact to therapeutic sensitivities has not yet been fully described.MATERIALS AND METHODS METex14 NSCLC cases were collected from three cohorts: the VISION trial, and data sets from Guardant360 and GenePlus. Clinicopathologic characteristics and METex14 mutation sites were analyzed and compared across data sets. Co-occurring genetic alterations and the clonality relationships to METex14 were evaluated.RESULTS Of 40,824 NSCLCs, 692 METex14 cases (1.7%) were identified, including 332 in Guardant360, 188 in VISION, and 172 in GenePlus. The demographics and mutation type and/or sites were similar in the Asian versus Western cohorts. MET amplification, which were found to be associated with sensitivity to MET kinase inhibitors, co-occurs in 7.6%-13.8% of cases, whereas kinase domain secondary mutation of MET co-occurs in 5%-6%. When co-occurring with METex14, EGFR mutations were often identified as the dominant clone (78%, 7 of 9), whereas when co-occurring, METex14 (39%, 7 of 18) and KRAS (44%, 8 of 18) had similar rates of clonal dominance. PIK3CA and PTEN mutations were almost always subclones (89%, 16 of 18) to METex14. Moreover, RET-CCDC6 fusion and EGFR mutation were detected following crizotinib treatment in two patients, suggesting novel mechanisms of resistance.CONCLUSION METex14 mutations frequently co-occur with other potential driver oncogenes with differing patterns of clonal dominance observed among the drivers. This cellular context can provide insights into whether METex14 is acting as a primary oncogenic driver or resistance mechanism and help guide treatment choices.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom