z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply to “Comments on ‘MSE minus CAPE is the True Conserved Variable for an Adiabatically Lifted Parcel’”
Author(s) -
David M. Romps
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of the atmospheric sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.853
H-Index - 173
eISSN - 1520-0469
pISSN - 0022-4928
DOI - 10.1175/jas-d-15-0334.1
Subject(s) - entropy (arrow of time) , convention , thermodynamics , context (archaeology) , mathematics , statistical physics , triple point , simple (philosophy) , physics , law , geography , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , political science
A standard convention in moist thermodynamics, adopted by D. M. Romps and others, is to set the specific energy and entropy of dry air and liquid water to zero at the triple-point temperature and pressure. P. Marquet claims that this convention leads to physically incorrect results. To support this claim, Marquet presents numerical calculations of a lifted parcel. It is shown here that the claim is false and that the numerical calculations of Marquet are in error. In the context of a simple two-phase thermodynamic system, an analysis is presented here of the freedoms one has to choose additive constants in the definitions of energy and entropy. Many other misconceptions are corrected as well.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here