
Mechanisms of Vasovagal Syncope in the Young: Reduced Systemic Vascular Resistance Versus Reduced Cardiac Output
Author(s) -
Stewart Julian M.,
Medow Marvin S.,
Sutton Richard,
Visintainer Paul,
Jardine David L.,
Wieling Wouter
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.116.004417
Subject(s) - medicine , splanchnic , vasovagal syncope , vascular resistance , supine position , cardiology , cardiac output , orthostatic intolerance , blood pressure , anesthesia , hemodynamics , blood volume , orthostatic vital signs , syncope (phonology)
Background Syncope is a sudden transient loss of consciousness and postural tone caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. The most common form is vasovagal syncope ( VVS ). Presyncopal progressive early hypotension in older VVS patients is caused by reduced cardiac output ( CO ); younger patients have reduced systemic vascular resistance ( SVR ). Using a priori criteria for reduced CO (↓ CO ) and SVR (↓ SVR ), we studied 48 recurrent young fainters comparing subgroups of VVS with VVS ‐↓ CO , VVS ‐↓ SVR , and both VVS ‐↓ CO &↓ SVR . Methods and Results Subjects were studied supine and during 70‐degrere upright tilt with a Finometer to continuously measure blood pressure, CO , and SVR and impedance plethysmography to estimate thoracic, splanchnic, pelvic, and calf blood volumes, blood flows, and vascular resistances and electrocardiogram to measure heart rate and rhythm. Central blood volume was decreased in all VVS compared to control. VVS ‐↓ CO was associated with decreased splanchnic blood flow and increased splanchnic blood pooling compared to control. Seventy‐five percent of VVS patients had reduced SVR , including 23% who also had reduced CO . Many VVS ‐↓ SVR increased CO during tilt, with no difference in splanchnic pooling, caused by significant increases in splanchnic blood flow and reduced splanchnic resistance. VVS ‐↓ CO &↓ SVR patients had splanchnic pooling comparable to VVS ‐↓ CO patients, but SVR comparable to VVS ‐↓ SVR . Splanchnic vasodilation was reduced, compared to VVS ‐↓ SVR , and venomotor properties were similar to control. Combined splanchnic pooling and reduced SVR produced the earliest faints among the VVS groups. Conclusions Both ↓ CO and ↓ SVR occur in young VVS patients. ↓ SVR is predominant in VVS and is caused by impaired splanchnic vasoconstriction.