Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews in Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And OutcomesPeer ReviewedZubin J. Eapen +62013Journals
Comparative effectiveness reviews offer a systematic method to critically appraise existing research and to identify unaddressed clinical areas in cardiovascular disease where significant morbidity, mortality, and variation in the use of resources persist. To delineate and help select areas where comparative effectiveness reviews are needed, the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality involved stakeholders in prioritization of the research agenda.
The content you want is available to Zendy users.
Already have an account? Sign inHaving issues? Contact support