z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Development and Cross-Validation of Anthropometric Predictive Equations to Estimate Total Body Fat Percentage in Adult Women in Sri Lanka
Author(s) -
Nirmala Rathnayake,
Gayani Alwis,
Janaka Lenora,
Sarath Lekamwasam
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of obesity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 2090-0716
pISSN - 2090-0708
DOI - 10.1155/2020/2087346
Subject(s) - anthropometry , medicine , concordance , linear regression , cross sectional study , sri lanka , regression analysis , skinfold thickness , demography , statistics , mathematics , geography , pathology , sociology , tanzania , environmental planning
Attempts have been made to estimate body fat using anthropometry, and most of them are country-specific. This study was designed to develop and cross-validate anthropometric predictive equations to estimate the total body fat percentage (TBFP) of Sri Lankan adult women. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Galle, Sri Lanka, with two groups: Group A (group for equation development) and Group B (cross-validation group) ( n  = 175 each) of randomly selected healthy adult women aged 30–60 years. TBFP (%) was quantified with total body DXA (TBFP DXA ). Height (m), weight (kg), and skinfold thickness (SFT, mm) at six sites and circumferences (cm) at five sites were measured. In the first step, four anthropometric equations were developed based on the data obtained from multiple regression analyses (TBFP DXA  = dependent variable and anthropometric measurements and age = independent variables) with Group A. They were developed on the basis of circumferences (TBFP1), SFTs (TBFP2), circumferences and SFTs (TBFP3), and highly significant circumferences and SFTs ( r  ≥ 0.6) (TBFP4). In the second step, the newly developed equations were cross-validated using Group B. Three equations (TBFP1, TBFP2, and TBFP4) showed the agreement with cross-validation criteria. There were no differences between TBFP DXA and TBFP estimated by these equations ( p > 0.05). They showed higher measurement concordance with TBFP DXA ; correlation between measured TBFP with DXA and estimated with TBFP1, TBFP2, and TBFP4, respectively, was 0.80 ( R 2  = 0.65, SEE = 3.10), 0.83 ( R 2  = 0.69, SEE = 2.93), and 0.84 ( R 2  = 0.72, SEE = 2.78). Three anthropometric measurements based on predictive equations were developed and cross-validated to satisfactorily estimate the TBFP in adult women.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here