English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two algorithms for screening sera for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 were compared for their efficiency in identifying a true-positive sample in a population with heterogeneous risk factors, using the criteria of specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). In the first algorithm, all sera were screened by using a single enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, and a specificity of 98.6% and a PPV of 69.3% was calculated for true-positive sera. The second algorithm employed two different EIA kits in parallel to screen each sample. In the first instance, a specificity and a PPV of 100% was calculated if a positive sample was defined as reactive by both EIA kits; in the second, a specificity of 99.97% and a PPV of 99.4% was obtained if this criterion was extended to include a combination of one reactive and one equivocal result obtained with the two EIA kits.

Predicting human immunodeficiency virus type 1-positive sera by using two enzyme immunoassay kits in a parallel testing format