English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To examine the consistency and comparability of anti-hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBcAg) assays, four blood donation centers of the Red Cross in the Federal Republic of Germany tested 4,080 unselected blood donors with six different tests in parallel. Confirmation testing of reactive samples was done in the National Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis. Depending on the test kit used, 4.1 to 9.9% of serum samples were initially positive and 2.9 to 7.5% were repeatedly positive. Sixteen percent of serum samples were positive in at least one test but only three percent were positive in all six tests. Statistical analysis of frequency distribution of optical densities for each test suggested that there should be a correction of the cutoff values. This reduced the number of false-positive results by half, but a significant proportion of discrepant results could not be resolved. The lack of specificity and consistency requires cautious interpretation of isolated anti-HBcAg results in clinical specimens. Screening of predominantly anti-HBcAg-negative populations (e.g., blood donors) by the current anti-HBcAg test kits will almost necessarily give unsatisfactory results.

Unsatisfactory specificities and sensitivities of six enzyme immunoassays for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen