English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The XylR protein controls expression from thePseudomonas putida TOL plasmid upper pathway operon promoter (Pu) in response to aromatic effectors. XylR-dependent stimulation of transcription from a Pu::lacZ fusion shows different induction kinetics with different effectors. With toluene, activation followed a hyperbolic curve with an apparentK of 0.95 mM and a maximum β-galactosidase activity of 2,550 Miller units. Witho -nitrotoluene, in contrast, activation followed a sigmoidal curve with an apparentK of 0.55 mM and a Hill coefficient of 2.65.m -Nitrotoluene kept the XylR regulator in an inactive transcriptional form. Therefore, upon binding of an effector, the substituent on the aromatic ring leads to productive or unproductive XylR forms. The different transcriptional states of the XylR regulator are substantiated by XylR mutants. XylRE172K is a mutant regulator that is able to stimulate transcription from the Pu promoter in the presence ofm -nitrotoluene; however, its response tom -aminotoluene was negligible, in contrast with the wild-type regulator. These results illustrate the importance of the electrostatic interactions in effector recognition and in the stabilization of productive and unproductive forms by the regulator upon aromatic binding. XylRD135N and XylRD135Q are mutant regulators that are able to stimulate transcription from Pu in the absence of effectors, whereas substitution of Glu for Asp135 in XylRD135E resulted in a mutant whose ability to recognize effectors was severely impaired. Therefore, the conformation of mutant XylRD135Q as well as XylRD135N seemed to mimic that of the wild-type regulator when effector binding occurred, whereas mutant XylRD135E seemed to be blocked in a conformation similar to that of wild-type XylR and XylRE172K upon binding to an inhibitor molecule such asm -nitrotoluene orm -aminotoluene.

Modulation of the Function of the Signal Receptor Domain of XylR, a Member of a Family of Prokaryotic Enhancer-Like Positive Regulators