English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The exposure of surface protein antigens on virulent phase I Coxiella burnetti was compared with that on avirulent phase II cells. Although anti-phase II antibodies did not bind to the surfaces of native intact phase I cells, they bound to phase I proteins if the proteins were solubilized for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by immunoblotting. In addition, removal of the phase I lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by trichloroacetic acid exposed surface proteins for reactivity with anti-phase II antibodies, as shown by immunofluorescence assays, direct antibody binding, and immunoelectron microscopy using protein A-colloidal gold conjugates. Based on these observations, a simple model of phase variation is proposed to explain the apparently conflicting notions of the identity of the phase II antigen(s). The model suggests that the phase I LPS sterically hinders access of anti-phase II antibodies to a multitude of shared protein antigens, any one of which may confer phase II specificity. Exposure of these shared protein antigens through the appearance of a more truncated LPS (phase II) or extraction of the smooth-type phase I LPS allows antibody accessibility and therefore confers apparent phase II serospecificity.

Steric hindrance of antibody binding to surface proteins of Coxiella burnetti by phase I lipopolysaccharide