English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Samples of water, soil, needles, and bark were collected from three different forest environments and from a pulp and paper mill. In addition, samples of fresh produce were obtained from a local supermarket. All samples were examined for total and fecal coliforms. The counts obtained from the forestrelated samples did not correlate with sample type or location. When 123 isolates were identified biochemically, 71% wereKlebsiella , 19%Enterobacter , 8%Citrobacter , and 2%Escherichia . All theCitrobacter , 75% of theEnterobacter , and 65% of theKlebsiella were negative for growth in elevated coliform (EC) broth. All theEscherichia were EC positive. The counts obtained from the fresh produce were generally higher than the forest counts, but the distribution of biotypes was similar. Of the 146 isolates examined 64% wereKlebsiella , 14% wereEscherichia , 14% wereEnterobacter , and 8% wereCitrobacter . All theEnterobacter andCitrobacter were EC negative, whereas 25% of theKlebesiella and 80% of theEscherichia were EC positive.

Klebsiella Biotypes Among Coliforms Isolated from Forest Environments and Farm Produce