English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The R/B Enteric Differential System for identifying enteric bacteria has been evaluated with 451 “unknown” cultures from the stock culture collection of the Center for Disease Control. An average of 89.6% of these cultures were correctly identified by the R/B system, when used as recommended by the manufacturer but without the assistance of serology. This percentage ranged, however, from 47% forKlebsiella to 100% forSerratia andProvidencia. Of 11 groups or genera ofEnterobacteriaceae tested, only three (Enterobacter, Serratia , andProvidencia ) were identified with 95% or better accuracy. Four groups (Arizona, Citrobacter, Escherichia , andSalmonella ) attained 90 to 95% accuracy of identification, and three groups (Edwardsiella, Proteus , andShigella ) scored between 85 and 90% accuracy. We recommend the R/B system as a screening device which is reasonably successful in grouping bacteria but not as a substitute for more exacting conventional procedures.

R/B Enteric Differential System for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae