English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We report the results obtained in comparative study on the extravascular passage of cefotaxime, employing three different methods: suction skin blister, skin window, and skin chamber. Applying the skin blister method in two different ways, we also studied the influence that suction pressure and time lapse between blister formation and antibiotic injection had on the results obtained in order to standardize the method and establish repeatability of the results. Using the skin chamber method, we studied the influence that the different protein contents in the fluid used to fill the skin chamber had on extravascular concentrations.

Suction skin blister, skin window, and skin chamber techniques to determine extravascular passage of cefotaxime in humans