English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The observation that the zero‐dimensional Geometric InvariantΣ   0    (  G  ;  A  )of Bieri–Neumann–Strebel–Renz can be interpreted as a horospherical limit set opens a direct trail from Poincaréˈs limit set    Λ  (  Γ  )    of a discrete group   Γ   of Möbius transformations (which contains the horospherical limit set of   Γ  ) to the roots of tropical geometry (closely related toΣ   0    (  G  ;  A  )when   G   is abelian). We explore this trail by introducing the horospherical limit set,    Σ  (  M  ;  A  )   , of a   G  ‐module   A   when   G   acts by isometries on a proper    CAT  (  0  )    metric space   M  . This is a subset of the boundary at infinity    ∂  M   . On the way, we meet instances where    Σ  (  M  ;  A  )    is the set of all conical limit points (  G   geometrically finite and   M   hyperbolic), the complement of the radial projection of a tropical variety (  G   abelian and   M   Euclidean) or the complement of a spherical building (  G   arithmetic and   M   symmetric).

Limit sets for modules over groups on CAT (0) spaces: from the Euclidean to the hyperbolic