Premium
Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical markers and histological classification in malignant canine mammary tumours
Author(s) -
Pastor Nieves,
Ezquerra Luis Javier,
Santella Massimo,
Caballé Nuria C.,
Tarazona Raquel,
Durán María Esther
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
veterinary and comparative oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.864
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1476-5829
pISSN - 1476-5810
DOI - 10.1111/vco.12603
Subject(s) - medicine , immunohistochemistry , pathology , malignancy , clinical significance , stage (stratigraphy) , carcinoma , breast carcinoma , breast cancer , cancer , univariate analysis , estrogen receptor , progesterone receptor , adenosquamous carcinoma , oncology , proportional hazards model , carcinosarcoma , adenocarcinoma , biology , multivariate analysis , paleontology
Abstract Canine mammary carcinoma represents a model for the study of human breast cancer, although the prognostic value of various clinical, histological and immunohistochemical parameters has shown contradictory results. A prospective study, through a 4‐year follow‐up, was performed in 77 patients with mammary carcinoma to analyse the association between histological diagnosis, grade of malignancy, peritumoral and vascular invasion. We have also performed immunohistochemistry for the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) that define human biomarkers of disease progression and treatment response. An association between histological diagnosis and clinical stage was observed with a high proportion of complex carcinoma classified as stage I. There was a higher proportion of ER + /PR + /HER2 − tumours in stage I. In contrast, triple‐negative tumours (ER − /PR − /HER2 − ) were found mainly in advanced clinical stages and were associated with vascular and peritumoral invasion. The tumours included in group VII (carcinosarcoma/adenosquamous carcinoma/other special types of carcinoma) had a higher expression of COX‐2. The univariate analysis showed that those patients with complex carcinoma had the lowest incidence of metastases and the highest probability of survival. In contrast, a high proportion of patients with anaplastic/inflammatory carcinoma developed metastases and showed the lowest probability of survival. In addition, the estimated survival time was shorter for those patients with triple‐negative tumours and those with high COX‐2 expression. However, in the multivariate analysis, only the peritumoral invasion maintained its prognostic significance. In conclusion, in our study anaplastic/inflammatory carcinomas had the worst prognosis with a high proportion of triple‐negative tumours in this category.