Premium
Systematic review of outcome parameters following treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome in the lower leg
Author(s) -
Vogels Sanne,
Ritchie Ewan D.,
Dongen Thijs T. C. F.,
Scheltinga Marc R. M.,
Zimmermann Wes O.,
Hoencamp Rigo
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of medicine and science in sports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.575
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1600-0838
pISSN - 0905-7188
DOI - 10.1111/sms.13747
Subject(s) - medicine , physical therapy , randomized controlled trial , fasciotomy , psychological intervention , surgery , clinical trial , physical medicine and rehabilitation , psychiatry
Objective Surgery is the gold standard in the management of chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) of the lower extremity, although recent studies also reported success following gait retraining. Outcome parameters are diverse, and reporting is not standardized. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the current evidence regarding treatment outcome of CECS in the lower leg. Material and Methods A literature search and systematic analysis were performed according to the PRISMA criteria. Studies reporting on outcome following treatment of lower leg CECS were included. Results A total of 68 reports fulfilled study criteria (n =; 3783; age range 12‐70 year; 7:4 male‐to‐female ratio). Conservative interventions such as gait retraining (n =; 2) and botulinum injection (n =; 1) decreased ICP ( x - =; 68 mm Hg to x - =; 32 mm Hg) and resulted in a 47% (±42%) rate of satisfaction and a 50% (±45%) rate of return to physical activity. Fasciotomy significantly decreased ICP ( x - =; 76 mm Hg to x - =; 24 mm Hg) and was associated with an 85% (±13%) rate of satisfaction and an 80% (±17%) rate of return to activity. Return to activity was significantly more often achieved ( P < .01) in surgically treated patients, except in one study favoring gait retraining in army personnel. Conclusion Surgical treatment of CECS in the lower leg results in higher rates of satisfaction and return to activity, compared to conservative treatment. However, the number of studies is limited and the level of evidence is low. Randomized controlled trials with multiple treatment arms and standardized outcome parameters are needed.