Premium
Compliance with North Dakota’s smoke‐free law among vape and tobacco specialty shops
Author(s) -
BuettnerSchmidt Kelly,
Miller Donald,
Orr Megan,
Rykal Katelyn,
Swanson Kathleen,
Berry Missy
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
public health nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.471
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1525-1446
pISSN - 0737-1209
DOI - 10.1111/phn.12916
Subject(s) - signage , environmental health , licensure , smoke , enforcement , compliance (psychology) , business , tobacco smoke , law enforcement , public health , law , medicine , advertising , psychology , nursing , engineering , political science , waste management , social psychology
Objective To determine compliance with North Dakota's smoke‐free law in vape shops and other tobacco specialty shops selling electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) or e‐liquids. Design In this 2019 descriptive study, shops ( n = 35) were assessed for compliance with the smoke‐free law by observation of indoor and outdoor areas for smoking or vaping, or evidence of such activity in prohibited areas, and the presence of required no‐smoking signs. Results Only two shops (5.7%) were fully compliant with the smoke‐free law. Full compliance for indoor and outdoor environments was 8.5% and 42.8%, respectively. Vaping occurred inside five shops (14.3%), and smoking occurred outdoors within required smoke‐free areas in two (5.7%) shops. Four (11.4%) and 17 (48.6%) shops complied with indoor and outdoor signage requirements, respectively. Conclusions Overall compliance remained low, although much of the noncompliance was related to signage. Use or evidence of ENDS use occurred both indoors and outdoors where prohibited by law. Classifying ENDS as tobacco products would require tobacco licensure of shops selling ENDS and e‐liquids, aiding in identification of the shops for education and enforcement efforts to ensure compliance with the law and to improve public health protection.