Premium
Potato virus Y infection hinders potato defence response and renders plants more vulnerable to Colorado potato beetle attack
Author(s) -
Petek Marko,
Rotter Ana,
Kogovšek Polona,
Baebler Špela,
Mithöfer Axel,
Gruden Kristina
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
molecular ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.619
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1365-294X
pISSN - 0962-1083
DOI - 10.1111/mec.12932
Subject(s) - biology , colorado potato beetle , potato virus y , plant virus , virus , virology , pest analysis , botany
Abstract In the field, plants are challenged by more than one biotic stressor at the same time. In this study, the molecular interactions between potato ( S olanum tuberosum L.), Colorado potato beetle ( L eptinotarsa decemlineata Say; CPB ) and Potato virus Y NTN ( PVY NTN ) were investigated through analyses of gene expression in the potato leaves and the gut of the CPB larvae, and of the release of potato volatile compounds. CPB larval growth was enhanced when reared on secondary PVY NTN ‐infected plants, which was linked to decreased accumulation of transcripts associated with the antinutritional properties of potato. In PVY NTN ‐infected plants, ethylene signalling pathway induction and induction of auxin response transcription factors were attenuated, while no differences were observed in jasmonic acid ( JA ) signalling pathway. Similarly to rearing on virus‐infected plants, CPB larvae gained more weight when reared on plants silenced in JA receptor gene ( coi1 ). Although herbivore‐induced defence mechanism is regulated predominantly by JA , response in coi1 ‐silenced plants only partially corresponded to the one observed in PVY NTN ‐infected plants, confirming the role of other plant hormones in modulating this response. The release of β‐barbatene and benzyl alcohol was different in healthy and PVY NTN ‐infected plants before CPB larvae infestation, implicating the importance of PVY NTN infection in plant communication with its environment. This was reflected in gene expression profiles of neighbouring plants showing different degree of defence response. This study thus contributes to our understanding of plant responses in agro‐ecosystems.