z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of cross‐match on packed cell volume after transfusion of packed red blood cells in transfusion‐naïve anemic cats
Author(s) -
Sylvane Brittany,
Prittie Jennifer,
Hohenhaus Ann E.,
Tozier Erik
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of veterinary internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.356
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1939-1676
pISSN - 0891-6640
DOI - 10.1111/jvim.15120
Subject(s) - medicine , cats , packed red blood cells , blood transfusion , anesthesia , incidence (geometry) , red blood cell , surgery , physics , optics
Background Novel feline RBC antigens might contribute to decreased efficacy of RBC transfusion and increased incidence of acute transfusion reactions (ATR). Objectives To examine the effect of major cross‐match in transfusion‐naïve anemic cats on the incidence of acute immunologic transfusion reaction and transfusion efficacy for up to 24 hours after transfusion. Animals Forty‐eight client owned transfusion‐naïve anemic cats. Methods Prospective, randomized, controlled study. All transfusion‐naïve cats receiving packed red blood cells (pRBC) transfusions from January 2016 to August 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Cats in the study group received cross‐match and blood type compatible pRBCs and cats in the control group received noncross‐matched blood type compatible pRBCs. Incidence of ATR and change in PCV after transfusion was recorded. Results No significant difference in incidence of transfusion reactions between cross‐matched and noncross‐matched groups (CM+ 4/24; 17%, CM– 7/24; 29%, P  = .16). No significant difference between groups in mean change in PCV after transfusion scaled to dose of pRBCs administered at any time point after transfusion (immediate: CM+ 0.62 ± 0.59, CM– 0.75 ± 0.48, P  = .41; 1 hour: CM+ 0.60 ± 0.66, CM– 0.74 ± 0.53, P  = .43; 12 hours: CM+ 0.70 ± 0.55, CM– 0.66 ± 0.60, P  = .81; 24 hours: CM+ 0.64 ± 0.71, CM– 0.55 ± 0.48, P  = .70). Conclusions and Clinical Importance Our results do not support use of the major cross‐match test to increase efficacy of, and to decrease adverse events associated with, RBC transfusion in AB blood typed transfusion‐naïve cats.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here