Premium
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of a cosmetic mask containing 89% of vichy volcanic mineralizing water and hyaluronic acid after facial laser procedures
Author(s) -
Torreao Paulo,
Phua Edmond,
Clark Raphael,
Fernandes Erika,
Pontes Thais,
Fonseca Ana P.,
Singh Nadia,
Seesurn Bandana,
Nielsen Marion,
Valois Audrey,
Kerob Delphine
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of cosmetic dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.626
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1473-2165
pISSN - 1473-2130
DOI - 10.1111/jocd.13972
Subject(s) - erythema , medicine , itching , burning sensation , dermatology , patient satisfaction , surgery
Background M89 M (Mineral 89 mask, Laboratoires Vichy, France), containing 89% Vichy volcanic mineralizing water and hyaluronic acid, aims to strengthen and repair skin barrier. Aims To assess the efficacy, tolerance, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (QOL) using M89 M after laser procedures (LP). Methods M89 M was applied immediately post‐LP for 10 minutes, then daily for 5 days and 2‐3 times a week, up to 28 days on the faces of 51 women. Evaluations were performed immediately post‐LP, immediately after M89 M application at D0, D1, D5, and D28, and included criteria such as erythema and skin dryness. Subjects scored burning and warm sensations, itching, skin tightness, and stinging. Skin hydration using a Corneometer, skin barrier integrity using a Tewameter, and erythema using a Chromameter were assessed. Local tolerance and adverse events were recorded. After 28 days, subjects answered a questionnaire regarding the M89 M subjective cosmetic properties and QOL. Results All subjects were in their mid‐forties with a phototype of II, III, or IV. M89 M significantly ( P < .001) reduced the immediate cutaneous discomfort sensation and laser procedure‐related symptoms (burning, warmth sensation, itching/stinging, skin tightness). Skin hydration, and erythema, assessed using instrumental measures, were also significantly improved immediately after mask application ( P ≤ .01). Subjects highly appreciated M89 M and their QOL improved after 28 days of use. Local tolerance was good to excellent in both studies. Conclusion M89 M is effective and safe immediately after esthetic procedures such as ablative and nonablative lasers and also improves the subject's QOL.