z-logo
Premium
Clinical importance of muscle volume in lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis adjusted with inverse probability weighting
Author(s) -
Hiraoka Atsushi,
Kumada Takashi,
Kariyama Kazuya,
Tada Toshifumi,
Tani Joji,
Fukunishi Shinya,
Atsukawa Masanori,
Hirooka Masashi,
Tsuji Kunihiko,
Ishikawa Toru,
Takaguchi Koichi,
Itobayashi Ei,
Tajiri Kazuto,
Shimada Noritomo,
Shibata Hiroshi,
Ochi Hironori,
Kawata Kazuhito,
Yasuda Satoshi,
Toyoda Hidenori,
Ohama Hideko,
Nouso Kazuhiro,
Tsutsui Akemi,
Nagano Takuya,
Itokawa Norio,
Hayama Korenobu,
Arai Taeang,
Imai Michitaka,
Koizumi Yohei,
Nakamura Shinichiro,
Joko Kouji,
Michitaka Kojiro,
Hiasa Yoichi,
Kudo Masatoshi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/jgh.15336
Subject(s) - lenvatinib , sarcopenia , medicine , hazard ratio , hepatocellular carcinoma , proportional hazards model , oncology , gastroenterology , liver cancer , multivariate analysis , cancer , confidence interval , sorafenib
Background and Aim This study aimed to elucidate the clinical importance of muscle volume loss (pre‐sarcopenia) in patients receiving lenvatinib as treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u‐HCC). Methods Of 437 u‐HCC patients treated with lenvatinib at specific institutions in Japan between March 2018 and May 2020, 151 with available computed tomography imaging data from the time of lenvatinib introduction were enrolled. Pre‐sarcopenia was diagnosed based on a previously reported cut‐off value calculation formula [psoas muscle area at level of middle of third lumbar vertebra (cm 2 )/height (m) 2 ]. Clinical features and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with inverse probability weighting were investigated retrospectively for their relationship with pre‐sarcopenia. Results Cox hazard multivariate analysis showed alpha‐fetoprotein (≥400 ng/mL) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.271, P  < 0.001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (C and D) (HR 1.625, P  = 0.018), and positive for pre‐sarcopenia (HR 1.652, P  = 0.042) to be significant prognostic factors. OS rates for the pre‐sarcopenia group ( n  = 41) were worse than those for the non‐pre‐sarcopenia group ( n  = 110) (0.5‐, 1‐, and 1.5‐year OS: 72.5%, 27.9%, and 7.0% vs 80.7%, 56.7%, and 46.1%, respectively; P  < 0.001), as was progression‐free survival ( P  = 0.025). Time to stopping lenvatinib or disease progression was better in the non‐pre‐sarcopenia group (0.5‐, 1‐, and 1.5‐year OS: 48.0%, 24.5%, and 8.4% vs 20.0%, 10.3%, and 4.2%, respectively; P  < 0.001). Also, the frequency of the adverse event appetite loss (any grade) was greater in the pre‐sarcopenia group (43.9% vs 18.2%, P  = 0.003). Conclusion Pre‐sarcopenia was shown to be a significant prognostic factor in patients treated with lenvatinib for u‐HCC.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here