Premium
Toward precision therapeutics: general and specific factors differentiate symptom change in depressed adolescents
Author(s) -
Aitken Madison,
Haltigan John D.,
Szatmari Peter,
Dubicka Bernadka,
Fonagy Peter,
Kelvin Raphael,
Midgley Nick,
Reynolds Shirley,
Wilkinson Paul O.,
Goodyer Ian M.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of child psychology and psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.652
H-Index - 211
eISSN - 1469-7610
pISSN - 0021-9630
DOI - 10.1111/jcpp.13194
Subject(s) - psychopathology , psychosocial , psychology , clinical psychology , anxiety , cognitive behavioral therapy , depression (economics) , randomized controlled trial , cognitive therapy , cognition , intervention (counseling) , conduct disorder , psychiatry , psychotherapist , medicine , economics , macroeconomics
Background The longitudinal course of multiple symptom domains in adolescents treated for major depression is not known. Revealing the temporal course of general and specific psychopathology factors, including potential differences between psychotherapies, may aid therapeutic decision‐making. Methods Participants were adolescents with major depressive disorder (aged 11–17; 75% female; N = 465) who were part of the IMPACT trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy, short‐term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and brief psychosocial intervention. Self‐reported symptoms at baseline and 6, 12, 36, 52, and 86 weeks postrandomization were analyzed with bifactor modeling. Results General psychopathology factor scores decreased across treatment and one‐year follow‐up. Specific melancholic features and depressive cognitions factors decreased from baseline to 6 weeks. Conduct problems decreased across treatment and follow‐up. Anxiety increased by 6 weeks and then reverted to baseline levels. Obsessions–compulsions did not change. Changes in general and specific factors were not significantly different between the three psychotherapies during treatment. During follow‐up, however, conduct problems decreased more in brief psychosocial intervention versus cognitive behavioral therapy (1.02, 95% Bayes credible interval 0.25, 1.96), but not versus short‐term psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Conclusions The clinical response signature in this trial is best revealed by rapid reductions in depression symptoms and general psychopathology. Protracted improvements in general psychopathology and conduct problems subsequently occur. Psychosocial treatments for adolescent depression have comparable effects on general and specific psychopathology, although a psychoeducational, goal‐focused approach may be indicated for youth with comorbid conduct problems.