Erratum

In the article by N. Schmitt, F.L. Oswald, B.H. Kim, M.A. Gillespie and L.J. Ramsay entitled “The Impact of Justice and Self‐serving Bias Explanation of the Perceived Fairness of Different Types of Selection Tests” in Volume 12, Numbers 1/2 of International Journal of Selection and Assessment , six means that appear in Table 6 6  Subgroup Reactions to Biodata, Situational Judgment Inventory, and ACT/SAT MeasuresMeasure Group Fairness Relevance Performance Belief Comp. Performance Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SDBiodata Cauc. 2.35 .84 3.32 .84 3.79 .76 3.04 .63 Afr.Am. 2.42 .90 3.08 .88 3.80 .65 3.03 .61 His.Am. 2.65 .80 3.29 .92 4.33 .75 3.23 .75 Asian 2.36 .86 3.25 .82 3.79 .80 3.00 .83 Male 2.33 .91 3.24 .89 3.76 .74 3.07 .67 Female 2.39 .85 3.30 .84 3.81 .75 3.04 .65ACT/SAT Cauc. 3.25 .97 3.08 .88 3.33 1.03 3.01 1.00 Afr.Am. 2.65 1.01 2.90 .81 2.97 .97 2.72 .90 His.Am. 2.68 .99 2.84 .98 2.70 .90 2.66 .96 Asian 3.29 1.04 3.09 .98 3.00 1.03 2.59 .97 Male 3.39 .98 3.20 .85 3.40 1.07 3.24 1.02 Female 3.08 .99 2.99 .88 3.20 1.01 2.84 .96SJI Cauc. 2.18 .81 3.09 .85 3.54 .70 2.99 .60 Afr.Am. 2.19 .81 3.03 .79 3.47 .83 2.90 .58 His.Am. 2.10 .83 3.22 1.10 3.70 .90 2.90 .28 Asian 2.10 1.00 2.94 .92 3.60 .83 2.97 .66 Male 2.12 .86 3.03 .85 3.40 .73 2.95 .69 Female 2.21 .82 3.09 .84 3.57 .73 2.99 .56Note: Cauc., Caucasian; Afr.Am., African American; His.Am., Hispanic American; Asian, Asian American., on page 168 are incorrect. In the correct table, which is printed below, each of the corrected means appears in the “Relevance” column. It should be noted that none of the original tests of significance or statements about the means reported in the text were incorrect.