Premium
Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Singh Sonal,
Wright Eugene E.,
Kwan Anita Y. M.,
Thompson Juliette C.,
Syed Iqra A.,
Korol Ellen E.,
Waser Nathalie A.,
Yu Maria B.,
Juneja Rattan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.12805
Subject(s) - dulaglutide , exenatide , liraglutide , medicine , type 2 diabetes , meta analysis , basal (medicine) , lixisenatide , sitagliptin , randomized controlled trial , diabetes mellitus , glucagon like peptide 1 receptor , confidence interval , endocrinology , gastroenterology , insulin , receptor , agonist
Aims Since 2005, several glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists ( GLP ‐1 RAs ) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta‐analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP ‐1 RAs compared with basal insulins. Materials and methods MEDLINE , EMBASE , CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials ( RCTs ) of ≥16 weeks’ duration comparing GLP ‐1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed‐effect pairwise meta‐analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies. Results Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta‐analysed. The once‐weekly GLP ‐1 RAs , exenatide long acting release ( LAR ) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide: −0.31% [95% confidence interval −0.42, −0.19], dulaglutide: −0.39% [−0.49, −0.29]) whilst once‐daily liraglutide and twice‐daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [−0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [−0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP ‐1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted. Conclusions Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP‐1 RA ’s, only the once‐weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.