English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Summary   Aim  To validate a deep‐learning (DL) algorithm for automated quantification of prostate cancer on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and explore the potential of PET/CT measurements as prognostic biomarkers.    Material and methods  Training of the DL‐algorithm regarding prostate volume was performed on manually segmented CT images in 100 patients. Validation of the DL‐algorithm was carried out in 45 patients with biopsy‐proven hormone‐naïve prostate cancer. The automated measurements of prostate volume were compared with manual measurements made independently by two observers. PET/CT measurements of tumour burden based on volume and SUV of abnormal voxels were calculated automatically. Voxels in the co‐registered  18 F‐choline PET images above a standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2·65, and corresponding to the prostate as defined by the automated segmentation in the CT images, were defined as abnormal. Validation of abnormal voxels was performed by manual segmentation of radiotracer uptake. Agreement between algorithm and observers regarding prostate volume was analysed by Sørensen‐Dice index (SDI). Associations between automatically based PET/CT biomarkers and age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score as well as overall survival were evaluated by a univariate Cox regression model.    Results  The SDI between the automated and the manual volume segmentations was 0·78 and 0·79, respectively. Automated PET/CT measures reflecting total lesion uptake and the relation between volume of abnormal voxels and total prostate volume were significantly associated with overall survival ( P  = 0·02), whereas age, PSA, and Gleason score were not.    Conclusion  Automated PET/CT biomarkers showed good agreement to manual measurements and were significantly associated with overall survival.

Deep learning‐based quantification of PET/CT prostate gland uptake: association with overall survival