
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation sensitizes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to the BET inhibitor JQ 1
Author(s) -
Fujiwara Hiroaki,
Tateishi Keisuke,
Kato Hiroyuki,
Nakatsuka Takuma,
Yamamoto Keisuke,
Tanaka Yasuo,
Ijichi Hideaki,
Takahara Naminatsu,
Mizuno Suguru,
Kogure Hirofumi,
Matsubara Saburo,
Nakai Yousuke,
Koike Kazuhiko
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
cancer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.035
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1349-7006
pISSN - 1347-9032
DOI - 10.1111/cas.13784
Subject(s) - isocitrate dehydrogenase , mutant , downregulation and upregulation , cancer research , mutation , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , idh1 , intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma , apoptosis , gene , pathology , enzyme , medicine , genetics , biochemistry
Cholangiocarcinoma is a life‐threatening disease with a poor prognosis. Although genome analysis unraveled some genetic mutation profiles in cholangiocarcinoma, it remains unknown whether such genetic abnormalities relate to the effects of anticancer drugs. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 ( IDH 1/2 ) are exclusively found in almost 20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ( ICC ). Recently, the anticancer effects of BET inhibitors including JQ 1 have been shown in various tumors. In the present study, we report that the antigrowth effect of JQ 1 differs among ICC cells and IDH 1 mutation sensitizes ICC cells to JQ 1. RBE cells harboring IDH 1 mutation was more sensitive to JQ 1 than Hu CCT 1 or HuH28 cells with wild‐type IDH 1 . JQ 1 induced apoptosis only in RBE cells through the upregulation of proapoptotic genes BAX and BIM . We found that the antigrowth effect was not attributed to downregulation of the MYC gene as a well‐known target of JQ 1 in various cancer cells. Notably, the forced expression of mutant IDH 1 successfully sensitized Hu CCT 1 cells to JQ 1. In addition, AGI ‐5198, a selective inhibitor of mutant IDH 1 partially reversed the decrease in viability after JQ 1 treatment and also suppressed the JQ 1‐induced apoptosis in RBE cells. These data suggest that IDH 1 mutation contributed to the growth inhibitory effect of JQ 1 in RBE cells. Furthermore, given that the effect of mutant IDH 1 was not recapitulated in glioblastoma cells, the enhancement of JQ 1 sensitivity by IDH 1 mutation seems to be specific for ICC cells. Our findings propose a new stratified therapeutic strategy based on IDH 1 mutation in ICC .