English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the insulinotropic action of the GIP system is desensitized, whereas this is not the case for the GLP‐1 system. This has raised an interesting discussion of whether GIP agonists or antagonists are most suitable for future treatment of T2DM together with GLP‐1‐based therapies. Homozygous carriers of the GIP receptor (GIPR) variant, [E354Q], display lower bone mineral density, increased bone fracture risk and slightly increased blood glucose. Here, we present an in‐depth molecular pharmacological phenotyping of GIPR‐[E354Q]. In silico modelling suggested similar interaction of the endogenous agonist GIP(1‐42) to [E354Q] as to GIPR wt. This was supported by homologous competition binding in COS‐7 cells revealing GIPR wt‐like affinities of GIP(1‐42) with  K  d  values of ~2 nmol/L and wt‐like agonist association rates ( K  on ). In contrast, the dissociation rates ( K  off ) were slower, resulting in 25% higher agonist residence time for GIPR‐[E354Q]. Moreover, in G αs  signalling (cAMP production) GIP(1‐42) was ~2‐fold more potent and more efficacious on GIPR‐[E354Q] compared to wt with 17.5% higher basal activity. No difference from GIPR wt was found in the recruitment of β‐arrestin 2, whereas the agonist‐induced internalization rate was 2.1‐ to 2.3‐fold faster for [E354Q]. Together with the previously described impaired recycling of [E354Q], our findings with enhanced signalling and internalization rate possibly explained by an altered ligand‐binding kinetics will lead to receptor desensitization and down‐regulation. This could explain the long‐term functional impairment of the GIP system in bone metabolism and blood sugar maintenance for [E354Q] carriers and may shed light on the desensitization of the insulinotropic action of GIP in patients with T2DM.

basic and clinical pharmacology and toxicology

Enhanced agonist residence time, internalization rate and signalling of the GIP receptor variant [E354Q] facilitate receptor desensitization and long‐term impairment of the GIP system