Premium
Pharmacokinetics of concentrated naloxone nasal spray for opioid overdose reversal: Phase I healthy volunteer study
Author(s) -
McDonald Rebecca,
Lorch Ulrike,
Woodward Jo,
Bosse Björn,
Dooner Helen,
Mundin Gill,
Smith Kevin,
Strang John
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/add.14033
Subject(s) - (+) naloxone , opioid overdose , pharmacokinetics , nasal spray , medicine , volunteer , bioavailability , anesthesia , opioid , nasal administration , narcotic antagonist , heroin , pharmacology , drug , receptor , biology , agronomy
Background and Aims Take‐home naloxone can prevent death from heroin/opioid overdose, but pre‐provision is difficult because naloxone is usually given by injection. Non‐injectable alternatives, including naloxone nasal sprays, are currently being developed. To be effective, the intranasal (i.n.) spray dose must be adequate but not excessive, and early absorption must be comparable to intramuscular (i.m.) injection. We report on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a specially produced concentrated novel nasal spray. The specific aims were to: (1) estimate PK profiles of i.n. naloxone, (2) compare early systemic exposure with i.n. versus i.m. naloxone and (3) estimate i.n. bioavailability. Design Open‐label, randomized, five‐way cross‐over PK study. Setting Clinical trials facility (Croydon, UK). Participants Thirty‐eight healthy volunteers (age 20–54 years; 11 female). Intervention and comparator Three doses of i.n. (1 mg/0.1 ml, 2 mg/0.1 ml, 4 mg/0.2 ml) versus 0.4 mg i.m. (reference) and 0.4 mg intravenous (i.v.) naloxone. Measurements Regular blood samples were taken, with high‐frequency sampling during the first 15 minutes to capture early systemic exposure. PK parameters were determined from plasma naloxone concentrations. Exploratory analyses involved simulation of repeat administration. Findings Mean peak concentration (C max ) values for 1 mg (1.51 ng/ml), 2 mg (2.87 ng/ml) and 4 mg (6.02 ng/ml) i.n. exceeded 0.4 mg i.m. (1.27 ng/ml) naloxone. All three i.n. doses rapidly achieved plasma levels > 50% of peak concentrations (T50%) by 10 minutes, peaking at 15–30 minutes (T max ). For comparison, the i.m. reference reached T max at 10 minutes. Mean bioavailability was 47–51% for i.n. relative to i.m. naloxone. Simulation of repeat dosing (2 × 2 mg i.n. versus 5 × 0.4 mg i.m. doses) at 3‐minute intervals showed that comparable plasma naloxone concentrations would be anticipated. Conclusions Concentrated 2 mg intranasal naloxone is well‐absorbed and provides early exposure comparable to 0.4 mg intramuscular naloxone, following the 0.4 mg intramuscular curve closely in the first 10 minutes post‐dosing and maintaining blood levels above twice the intramuscular reference for the next 2 hours.