Premium
Use of Prestudy Heparin Did Not Influence the Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients Treated for Symptomatic Venous Thromboem‐bolism in the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE Studies
Author(s) -
Prandoni Paolo,
Prins Martin H.,
Cohen Alexander T.,
Müller Katharina,
Pap Ákos F.,
Tewes Miriam C.,
Lensing Anthonie W. A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/acem.12585
Subject(s) - medicine , rivaroxaban , heparin , hazard ratio , incidence (geometry) , anticoagulant , confidence interval , anesthesia , venous thromboembolism , cardiology , surgery , thrombosis , warfarin , physics , optics , atrial fibrillation
Objectives In the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, the majority of patients received heparins to bridge the period during venous thromboembolism ( VTE ) diagnosis confirmation and the start of the study. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists ( VKA s), rivaroxaban may not require initial heparin treatment. Methods To evaluate the effect of prestudy heparin on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin/ VKA , the 3‐month incidence of recurrent VTE , and the 14‐day incidence of major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding were compared in patients who did and did not receive prestudy heparin. Results Of the 8,281 patients randomized, 6,937 (83.8%) received prestudy heparin (mean ± SD duration = rivaroxaban: 1.04 [± 0.74] days; enoxaparin 1.03 [± 0.42] days), and 1,344 (16.2%) did not. In patients who did not receive prestudy heparin, the incidences of recurrent VTE were similar in rivaroxaban (15 of 649, 2.3%) and enoxaparin/ VKA (13 of 695, 1.9%) patients (adjusted hazard ratio [ HR ] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [ CI ] = 0.52 to 2.37). The incidences of recurrent VTE were also similar in rivaroxaban (54 of 3,501, 1.5%) and enoxaparin/ VKA (69 of 3,436, 2.0%) patients who did receive prestudy heparin (adjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.52 to 1.06; p interaction = 0.32). The incidences of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban were not significantly different from those with enoxaparin/ VKA , either with (105 of 3,485, 3.0% vs. 104 of 3,428, 3.0%; adjusted HR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.29) or without (24 of 645, 3.7% vs. 30 of 688, 4.4%; adjusted HR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.40; p interaction = 0.68) prestudy heparin. Conclusions Although the majority of patients in the EINSTEIN studies received prestudy heparin, there were no notable differences in treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/ VKA in those who did and did not receive it.