Premium
Outcomes of catheter‐directed interventions in high‐risk pulmonary embolism‐a retrospective analysis
Author(s) -
Einarsson Freyr,
Sandström Charlotte,
Svennerholm Kristina,
Oras Jonatan,
Rylander Christian
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.738
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1399-6576
pISSN - 0001-5172
DOI - 10.1111/aas.13753
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary embolism , psychological intervention , retrospective cohort study , catheter , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine , surgery , nursing
Background First‐line treatment of high‐risk pulmonary embolism with persistent hypotension and/or signs of shock is intravenous thrombolysis. However, if thrombolysis is contraindicated due to risk of serious bleeding, or if it yields insufficient effect, surgical thrombectomy or catheter‐directed intervention (CDI) plus anticoagulation is recommended. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of the CDI modality introduced in a tertiary referral centre in 2013. Methods Retrospective comparison between patients treated with CDI plus anticoagulation (n = 22) and patients treated with anticoagulation only (n = 23) as used before the CDI technique was available. The main outcomes of interest were 90‐day survival and reduction of right to left ventricle diameter (RV/LV) ratio, using the Fischer's exact test and a mixed model, respectively, for statistical analysis. Results Ninety‐day survival was 59% after CDI and 61% after anticoagulation only; P = .903. The rate of RV/LV ratio reduction was 0.4 units higher per 24 hours in the CDI group (median 2.1 pre‐treatment), than in the anticoagulation only group (median 1.3 pre‐treatment); P = .007. Conclusion In patients with high‐risk pulmonary embolism, 90‐day survival was similar after treatment with CDI plus anticoagulation compared to anticoagulation only. The mean reduction in RV/LV ratio was larger in the CDI group. Our results support the use of CDI in selected patients, respecting the limitations and potential side effects of each technical device used.