English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Background  Lower thoracic esophageal cancer (LTEC) with celiac node metastasis and upper thoracic esophageal cancer (UTEC) with supraclavicular node metastasis were previously categorized as M1a diseases. Our study aimed to investigate whether the clinical significance of supraclavicular and celiac lymph node metastasis should be reevaluated in thoracic esophageal cancer.    Methods  A total of 6178 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2004–2015. Treatment strategies and outcomes (OS, overall survival; CSS, cancer‐specific survival) of patients with different nodal status were reviewed. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were performed in all subgroups.    Results  Multivariate analysis identified supraclavicular node metastasis but not celiac node metastasis as an independent predictor of both OS and CSS in LTEC. However, metastasis to supraclavicular or celiac nodes was not an independent predictor of OS and CSS in UTEC. Surgery was not associated with increased OS and CSS for UTEC with celiac or supraclavicular node metastasis but was favored as a predictor of better OS and CSS for LTEC with celiac or supraclavicular node metastasis. Radiotherapy benefited OS and CSS in LTEC involving celiac or supraclavicular nodes and in UTEC involving celiac nodes, while only OS benefited from radiotherapy in UTEC involving supraclavicular nodes.    Conclusions  These results provide preliminary evidence that the clinical significance of supraclavicular and celiac lymph node metastasis should be reevaluated in thoracic esophageal cancer with different prognostic information according to the primary sites.

Should the clinical significance of supraclavicular and celiac lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal cancer be reevaluated?