English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To construct large-scale superconducting devices, it is critical to enhance the current carrying capability of superconducting coils. One practical approach is to utilise assembled cables, composed of multiple strands, for the winding. There have only been a few investigations of the dependence of current distribution among the strands on the AC losses of the cables and coils wound with these cables. In this work, we studied three types of cables; i) 8/2 (eight 2 mm-wide strands) Roebel cable, 8/2 Roebel; ii) two parallel stacks (TPS) which have the same geometrical dimensions as the Roebel cable, 8/2 TPS; and iii) an equivalent four-conductor stack (ES) comprising four 4 mm-wide conductors, 4/4 ES. We proposed a new numerical approach that can achieve equal current sharing and free current sharing among the strands. We examined the loss behaviour of all three types of straight cables and two coil assemblies comprising two, and eight, stacks of double pancakes (DPCs) wound with these cables, respectively. 2D FEM analysis was carried out in COMSOL Multiphysics using the  H  - formulation. The stacks were modelled in parallel connection, with the same electric field applied to all strands, so that current is distributed between the conductors. Simulated transport AC loss results in the straight 8/2 Roebel cable, 8/2 TPS and 4/4 ES were compared with previously measured results as well as each other. The numerical AC loss results in two coil windings 2-DPC and 8-DPC wound with the 8/2 Roebel cables were compared with the results in coil windings wound with the 8/2 TPS and 4/4 ES. No transposition was introduced at the connection between double pancakes, in order that current can be shared among the strands in the 8/2 TPS and 4/4 ES. The results indicate that AC loss in the straight 8/2 TPS and 4/4 ES is larger than that in the 8/2 Roebel cable. Current is more concentrated in the outer strands for the straight 8/2 TPS and 4/4 ES than the 8/2 Roebel cable and causes greater AC loss than the 8/2 Roebel cable. The 8-DPC coil winding wound with the 8/2 Roebel cable has the smallest loss and the coil winding wound with the 8/2 TPS has the greatest loss at two current amplitudes investigated. At 113 A, the AC loss value in the 8-DPC coil winding wound with the 8/2 TPS is 2.2 times of that wound with the 8/2 Roebel cable.

AC Loss in REBCO Coil Windings Wound with Various Cables: Effect of Current Distribution among the Cable Strands