English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

When analyzing the defects of crowdsourced testing, the testing reports need to be preprocessed, including removing duplicate and false positives. At present, most crowdsourced testing research focuses on duplication of the reports, which has achieved high accuracy. However, studies on reducing false positives of defects have rarely been conducted. Starting from the duplication of defects in the reports, this paper discusses the relationship between the duplication and the accuracy of defects and proposes an estimation approach based on the defect distribution in historical crowdsourced testing projects. Experiments have shown that our approach can provide a priori knowledge of defects and exhibits good stability. We applied this approach to the defect population estimation of crowdsourced testing. With better experimental results, our improved model is more accurate than the original model. We attempt to apply it to the estimation of the defect population of crowdsourced testing, which is more accurate than the original model.

Estimate the accuracy of defects based on reports duplication in crowdsourced testing