English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Given the rarity of duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (dNETs), limited guidelines exist for resection of well-differentiated, ≤10 mm dNETS. As incidence rises, alternatives to surgery are valuable. We present 9 cases of endoscopic dNET resections and a literature review. Aims To demonstrate efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for dNETs ≤10 mm at 2 Canadian hospitals. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data on 7 patients that had endoscopic dNET resection from 2013–2018. Endoscopic resection occurred if dNETs were ≤10 mm in diameter, did not extend to the muscularis propria and lymphovascular invasion was absent. WHO 2017 classification was used. Results All patients had biopsies and 5 (71%) had EUS prior to resection; 4 females and 3 males underwent resection of 9 dNETs; 2 via cap-assisted snare polypectomy; 4 with cap-assisted band mucosectomy; and 2 over-the-scope clip-assisted resection. The median size was 10 mm (4–11); 6 (67%) dNETS were found in the duodenal bulb, 2 at the D1/D2 junction and 1 in D2 alone. The median age was 68.5 (50–79) years. All dNETs were submucosal and well-differentiated. The dNETs were resected en bloc, but 3 did not have clear margins. Two procedures were complicated by duodenal perforation; 1 requiring surgery and 18 days in hospital. One case was complicated by bleeding with successful endoscopic hemostasis. The majority (75%) of resections were day procedures. Patients were followed for 6–12 months with an EGD or chromogrannin A. None of the patients had endoscopic residual disease, but 1 patient required a second procedure to remove a dNET left in situ following the initial resection of 2 dNETs 12 months earlier. In our literature review of 178 patients, the majority of dNETs were resected by EMR 81% (150/185) versus ESD, similar to our experience. Patients were slightly younger with a mean age of 63.28, and most dNETs (46%) were found in the duodenal bulb. Complications included intraoperative bleeding, perforation and death in 17 (9.55%), 9 (5.06%) and 1 (0.06%) patient(s) respectively. The rate of recurrence was 4/178 (2.25%) and patients had a mean follow up of 26.1 months. Conclusions Well-differentiated dNETs ≤10 mm in diameter can be successfully resected endoscopically. Complications can be managed intraoperatively and hospital stay remains minimal. Funding Agencies None

A82 SUCCESSFUL RESECTION OF GRADE 1 DUODENAL NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS USING ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUES IN TWO CANADIAN HOSPITALS