English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

During wound healing, cells migrate with electrotactic bias as a collective entity. Unlike the case of the electric field (EF)-induced single-cell migration, the sensitivity of electrotactic response of the monolayer depends primarily on the integrity of the cell–cell junctions. Although there exist biochemical clues on how cells sense the EF, a well-defined physical portrait to illustrate how collective cells respond to directional EF remains elusive. Here, we developed an EF stimulating system integrated with a hydrogel-based traction measurement platform to quantify the EF-induced changes in cellular tractions, from which the complete in-plane intercellular stress tensor can be calculated. We chose immortalized human keratinocytes, HaCaT, as our model cells to investigate the role of EF in epithelial migration during wound healing. Immediately after the onset of EF (0.5 V/cm), the HaCaT monolayer migrated toward anode with ordered directedness and enhanced speed as early as 15 min. Cellular traction and intercellular stresses were gradually aligned perpendicular to the direction of the EF until 50 min. The EF-induced reorientation of physical stresses was then followed by the delayed cell-body reorientation in the direction perpendicular to the EF. Once the intercellular stresses were aligned, the reversal of the EF direction redirected the reversed migration of the cells without any apparent disruption of the intercellular stresses. The results suggest that the dislodging of the physical stress alignment along the adjacent cells should not be necessary for changing the direction of the monolayer migration.

Electric field–induced migration and intercellular stress alignment in a collective epithelial monolayer