English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The complicated and costly of concrete structures as well as the exposure to risk, owing to several factors such as ecological, design and construction, has resulted in a wide variety of methods for residential concrete structures, such as ferrocement sections technology, steel section technology, FCRP technology, and nano-material technologies. In this article the four approaches employed for rehabilitation of damaged concrete were compared. The questionnaire is given to 100 construction engineers and project management professionals to determine their preferred methods and advise them on their strength, effort, time and cost. To confirm the results, the researcher conducted an experiment to compare among these methods. research result, recommendations for future research, and conclusions were discussed in detail.

Compare Among Methods for Re-Habitation Damaged Concrete Beams-Ferrocement, Steel, FCRP and Nano-Materials Sections