English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper discusses the development of network of field research stations at one of Russian Universities as an element of the strategy to increase its international visibility and recognition. The views of University leading scientists about the perspectives and the risks in the development of this network are analyzed through the conceptual models of ‘secluded research’ and ‘research in wild’[1]. Departing from the methodological approach of L. Boltanski and L. Thévenot in studying the ways human actors are justifying their actions (orders of worth), we claim that basic principles of ‘secluded research’ and ‘research in wild’ could be considered as justification principles that legitimize specific type of research management. By comparing the shortcomings and advantages of the two sets of principles, the paper provides insights for better realization of the importance of the efforts to develop University’ network of field research stations and offers a critical reflection on them (which by itself is a resource for the further works in that direction).

Perfecting the Art of Managing Field Research Stations: Regimes of Justification