English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Are editorial decisions biased? A recent discussion in Learned Publishing hasfocused on one aspect of potential bias in editorial decisions, namely seasonal(e.g., monthly) variations in acceptance rates of research journals. In thisletter, we contribute to the discussion by analyzing data from Physical ReviewLetters (PRL), a journal published by the American Physical Society. We studiedthe 190,106 papers submitted to PRL from January 1990 until September 2012. Nostatistically significant variations were found in the monthly acceptancerates. We conclude that the time of year that the authors of a paper submittheir work to PRL has no effect on the fate of the paper through the reviewprocess.

Acceptance rates in Physical Review Letters : no seasonal bias