English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Accurate measures of liver fat content are essential for investigating the role of hepatic steatosis in the pathophysiology of multiple metabolic disorders. No traditional imaging methods can accurately quantify liver fat content. [ 1 H]‐magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is restricted in large‐scale studies because of the practical and technological issues. Previous attempts on computer‐aided ultrasound quantification of liver fat content varied in method, and the ultrasound quantitative parameters measured from different ultrasound machines were hardly comparable. We aimed to establish and validate a simple and propagable method for quantitative assessment of liver fat content based on the combination of standardized ultrasound quantitative parameters, using [ 1 H]‐MRS as gold standard. Totally 127 participants were examined with both ultrasonography (US) and [ 1 H]‐MRS. Ultrasound hepatic/renal echo‐intensity ratio (H/R) and ultrasound hepatic echo‐intensity attenuation rate (HA) were obtained from ordinary ultrasound images using computer program. Both parameters were standardized using a tissue‐mimicking phantom before analysis. Standardized ultrasound H/R and HA were positively correlated with the liver fat content by [ 1 H]‐MRS ( r  = 0.884,  P  < 0.001 and  r  = 0.711,  P  < 0.001, respectively). Linear regression analysis showed ultrasound H/R could modestly predict the amount of liver fat (adjusted explained variance 78.0%,  P  < 0.001). The addition of ultrasound HA slightly improved the adjusted explained variance to 79.8%. Difference of estimated liver fat contents between different ultrasound machines and operators was reasonably well. Thus, computer‐aided US is a valid method to estimate liver fat content and can be applied extensively after standardization of ultrasound quantitative parameters.

Standardized Ultrasound Hepatic/Renal Ratio and Hepatic Attenuation Rate to Quantify Liver Fat Content: An Improvement Method