Premium
SO 2 Emission Estimates Using OMI SO 2 Retrievals for 2005–2017
Author(s) -
Qu Zhen,
Henze Daven K.,
Li Can,
Theys Nicolas,
Wang Yi,
Wang Jun,
Wang Wei,
Han Jihyun,
Shim Changsub,
Dickerson Russell R.,
Ren Xinrong
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1029/2019jd030243
Subject(s) - environmental science , latitude , ozone monitoring instrument , zenith , china , meteorology , climatology , atmospheric sciences , ozone , remote sensing , geography , geodesy , geology , archaeology
SO 2 column densities from Ozone Monitoring Instrument provide important information on emission trends and missing sources, but there are discrepancies between different retrieval products. We employ three Ozone Monitoring Instrument SO 2 retrieval products (National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) standard (SP), NASA prototype, and BIRA) to study the magnitude and trend of SO 2 emissions. SO 2 column densities from these retrievals are most consistent when viewing angles and solar zenith angles are small, suggesting more robust emission estimates in summer and at low latitudes. We then apply a hybrid 4D‐Var/mass balance emission inversion to derive monthly SO 2 emissions from the NASA SP and BIRA products. Compared to HTAPv2 emissions in 2010, both posterior emission estimates are lower in United States, India, and Southeast China, but show different changes of emissions in North China Plain. The discrepancies between monthly NASA and BIRA posterior emissions in 2010 are less than or equal to 17% in China and 34% in India. SO 2 emissions increase from 2005 to 2016 by 35% (NASA)–48% (BIRA) in India, but decrease in China by 23% (NASA)–33% (BIRA) since 2008. Compared to in situ measurements, the posterior GEOS‐Chem surface SO 2 concentrations have reduced NMB in China, the United States, and India but not in South Korea in 2010. BIRA posteriors have better consistency with the annual growth rate of surface SO 2 measurement in China and spatial variability of SO 2 concentration in China, South Korea, and India, whereas NASA SP posteriors have better seasonality. These evaluations demonstrate the capability to recover SO 2 emissions using Ozone Monitoring Instrument observations.